Previous Page  123 / 130 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 123 / 130 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 123

access

to

water

and

sanitation

for

all

• Facilitating capacity building for stakeholders on crucial

issues and problems with water and sanitation monitoring

• Establishing a platform for data sharing and updating

news on SDG 6. This can be built as a communication tool

linking members of the SDG 6-CL and other interested

parties, including decision makers

• Linking ideas, opinions and insights between high- and

low-level stakeholders

• Proposing and implementing new monitoring approaches

with reference to those applied successfully worldwide

• Adopting SDG 6-CL as the main contact and implement-

ing entity for SDG 6 in Lebanon, which can later assume

the responsibilities of an SDG 6 National Committee.

The first step by the SDG 6-CL was to conduct a survey on

the priorities of the 11 indicators listed in the SDG 6 goal.

This helped to select the most significant indicators to begin

dealing with in Lebanon. It became clear to the SDG 6-CL

that the priorities are governed by the water sector. Thus,

indicators 6.1.1, 6.3.2 and 6.6.1 are the most significant. The

priorities were therefore given as follows:

• Indicator 6.3.2: Proportion of bodies of water with good

ambient water quality, where 5 priority selections were

matched

• Indicator 6.1.1 and 6.6.1: Proportion of the population

using safely managed drinking water services; and change

in the extent of water-related ecosystems over time, where

3 priority selections were matched for each.

The insights of the stakeholders on water supply and sanita-

tion were summarised as follows:

• Water consumers, farmers and academics are pessimistic

about the water and sanitation sectors

• Water and sanitation sector employees stated that solu-

tions should be rapidly taken

• There are many promises of improvement from high-level

stakeholders regarding water and sanitation

• It is obvious that capacity building by various stakehold-

ers is crucial.

The following points can be concluded:

• Current water supply and sanitation services are unac-

ceptable

• Mismanagement is the main reason for water problems

and sanitation in Lebanon

• Institutional coordination, data exchange and sharing are

still unsatisfactory

• Water and sanitation monitoring systems in Lebanon are

unacceptable and sometimes bad

• SDG 6-CL has declared that the engagement of Lebanon

in SDG 6 is of great benefit, and that collaborative projects

run with financial support would be a helpful tool if intro-

duced by UN Water

• Services for water-related ecosystem are poor, and the

water is contaminated

• Water efficiency is badly defined and sometimes unsatis-

factory, and water systems are obviously stressed

• There is a necessity to adopt all SDG 6 indicators, with

some of them modified according to the country’s needs.

A neglected spring

Sewage outfall into river water, a common feature in Lebanon

Image: CNRS-L

Image: CNRS-L

Priority of SDG 6 indicators for Lebanon as evidenced

by the SDG 6-CL members

Source: CNRS-L, 2018

Frequency of selection by SDG-6-CL members

SDG-6- indicators

6.1.1

6.2.1

6.3.1

6.3.2

6.4.1

6.4.2

6.5.1

6.5.2

6.6.1

6.a.1

6.b.1

1

2

3

4

5

6