Previous Page  85 / 130 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 85 / 130 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 85

A B

et ter

W

or ld

soil for agriculture, but also safeguards people and ecosys-

tems against natural disasters such as floods, fires, wind

and droughts. Ecosystem functions provide three main

advantages to human well-being – provisioning services,

e.g. water, productive grazing, cultivated crops, firewood,

building materials and medicinal plants; cultural services –

identity and place attachment; and regulating services such

as sediment retention, water absorption, flood regulation and

drought resilience.

In the case of the Ntabelanga and Lalini dams, the most

valuable ecological infrastructure is robust, fertile soils that

can resist erosion and provide a basis for improved agri-

cultural production. The further degradation of ecological

infrastructure in these catchments is the greatest threat to

the adaptive capacity of people and ecosystems. The robust-

ness of ecosystems and their functionality can be enhanced

by increasing natural vegetation cover, improving the organic

What nature delivers to us,

good or bad

Nature: Ecological Infrastructure

Public assets (e.g. finance) and

infrastructure (e.g. dams)

Mainly exogenous human-influenced

drivers – markets, politics, economy

Mainly endogenous

human-influenced drivers

–physical, conceptual

and motivational

infrastructure

Including weather and

ecosystem services’

responses to land and

resource use

Adaptive planning management

and governance

Learn Connect Trust

Human assets and well-being, including human

capacity to act, human values, opportunities,

responsibilities, equity, voice identity

Direct drivers – all Natural Resource Management

interventions, good or bad

Awareness Willingness

A social-ecological systems framework for integrated natural resource

management, understanding and action in the Tsitsa catchment

Early on, NLEIP scientists and managers drew up a central

guiding social-ecological framework (see diagram above) to

help conceptually guide and direct actions, processes and

interlinkages. As one example of its use, participants can

locate their particular initiatives somewhere on the diagram,

and are also then able to better see their interlinkages to other

elements; and overall, NLEIP administrators and funders are

able to see which elements have which levels of attention.

PLUS

Two key overraching issues to remember throughout

1. Multiple interconnected scales

(local – regional – global) and across multiple corresponding

levels of governance

2. A constantly changing milieu

with thresholds and tipping points, involving history, power

changes, baselines, trends and scenarios

At the centre of the hub are natural resource management

interventions which impact on ecological infrastructure (bottom

block), in turn influencing ecosystem services (left block; the

reason for the curved return arrow is to remind us that sometimes

certain exogenous natural happenings like floods or droughts can

impact ecological infrastructure without necessarily any human

involvement). The ecosystem services in the left block go on to

interact with human assets and well-being in the top block. The

three closely-positioned blocks on the right refer to endogenous

human infrastructures/capitals which play a key role in influencing

NRM, whilst the strong arrow coming from the top right-hand

corner depicts exogenous human drivers usually out of our control

as local residents or actors. The bridges (non-arrowed connections)

designate overlaps where it may be difficult to place an attribute in

one or the other block category, or the two blocks and their links

may need more unpacking than shown here, in order to be clear.

Two overall messages (1 and 2) apply throughout.

Clearing silver wattle in the Upper Umzimvubu to improve streamflow,

biodiversity and grazing potential in a land user incentives programme with

Conservation South Africa

Image: DEA RSA

Source: DEA RSA