Previous Page  35 / 130 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 35 / 130 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 35

A B

et ter

W

or ld

the options are to improve cultural practices that reduce

on-farm water losses, and to increase the efficiency of crop

consumptive water use and improve irrigation efficiency.

Other measures that indirectly contribute to water saving

include irrigation scheduling based on rainfall patterns; crop

performance evaluation to identify critical water-stress-sensi-

tive growth stages; the incorporation of ICT and a geographic

information system (GIS) to improve water delivery services

in irrigation through better water control; land levelling to

improve water management; and the improvement of rain-fed

agriculture through terracing and on-farmwater conservation.

The tail water recovery system for rice cultivation

A tail water recovery system is designed to collect, store and

distribute irrigation or rain water runoff from a farm for reuse

(see figures 1 and 2). If the runoff water is not utilised, it will

eventually flow into the sea. The captured water is pumped

and delivered effectively into a supply system before reuse.

A tail water recovery research project conducted at

MARDI, Seberang Perai has shown that the total amount

of water saved from rice cultivation ranged from 20 to 30%

(see table 1). The ratio of cultivated area to storage pond was

10 to 1. During the planting season, the captured tail water

from excess rainfall was sufficient to supplement rainwater

in order to meet the seasonal water requirement (see figure

3). Since the implementation of the project, no additional

irrigation water has been needed for rice cultivation in the

research plot, showing improved irrigation efficiency and

water saving. Additionally, the residues from chemical appli-

cations were found to be localised to the application areas in

the field rather than distributed to non-target areas such as

collection drains or a storage pond.

Improving the water productivity index

In most cases, the single most important avenue for manag-

ing water demand in agriculture is through increasing

agricultural productivity with respect to water. Increase

in crop yields, i.e. production per unit of land, is the most

important indication of improved crop water productivity.

Yield increases are made possible through a combination

of improved water control, land management, diversity and

agronomic practices. Managing overall demand by focusing

on water productivity is more important than concentrating

on the technical efficiency of water use alone.

Breeding crop varieties with higher water-use efficiency

is seen as providing part of the solution to reduce water

demand. For instance, in a rice crop breeding programme,

two key processes have been exploited to achieve higher

water-use efficiency:

• Reduction in growth duration while maintaining or even

improving crop yield

• Synthesizing more biomass in exchange for water tran-

spired by the crop, i.e. improving crop transpiration

efficiency and planting drought-tolerant varieties.

Table 2 lists some of the improved rice varieties with a short

maturation period and high yield.

Shallow groundwater / tube well

The exploitation of shallow tube-wells for irrigation is suit-

able for short-term crops such as vegetables and field crops

and commonly found near lowland and coastal areas and

used profitably by small farms (see figure 4). During agricul-

Description

Off-season

May–Aug

2014

Main-season

Nov–Mar

2014/2015

Off-season

May–Aug

2015

Rainfall during growth

period (mm)

768

940

798

Direct pumping from

storage pond (mm)

322

247

264

Total water supply (mm)

1,090

1,187

1,062

Water saved by

recycling (%)

29.5

20.8

24.8

Net withdrawal from

storage pond (m

3

)

793

1092

293

Estimated energy cost

Total amount of water

pumped (m

3

)

27,270 20,940 22,300

Total amount of diesel

used (L)

330

235

300

Total cost of diesel (RM)

(RM 2.20/L)

726

517

660

Energy cost per ha (RM)

85.80

61.10

78.0

Table 1: Water saving in tail water recovery system

Ratio of cultivated area to storage pond: 10:1

Currency conversion: US$1 to RM 4.2

Varieties

Maturation*

main season – off season

Potential

yield (mt/ha)

Bajong/Biris

160–170

3

Bario/Mamut/Bubuk

140–160

3

Malinja

137–147

4

Setanjung

135–142

5

Mahsuri

134 –138

5

MR 84

124–137

7

MR 127

120–128

7

MR 211

99–100

8

MR 185

112–119

8

MR 219/ MR220

105–120

10

MR 253/MR263

104–110

10

MR 220 CL1 & CL2

97–113

10

MR 284

105–110

10

MR 297

100–110

10

Table 2: Increased water productivity through reduced

growth duration and increased yield

*Maturation measured in number of days after sowing

Source: Malaysian government

Source: Malaysian government