Previous Page  23 / 74 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 74 Next Page
Page Background

[

] 21

J

ust

, P

e aceful

and

I

nclusi v e

S

ocieties

2nd World Forum on Intercultural Dialogue, 29 May–1 June 2013, Baku, Azerbaijan

and the Middle East. However, it is increasingly becoming

an issue in the Asia Pacific region where more than half of

the world’s population lives, a population that is extremely

diverse. Innovative cooperation mechanisms are in place in

that region to prevent tensions and mitigate the risk of radi-

calisation and conflict. It will be interesting to hear from the

Asia-Pacific perspective and to discuss possible exchange of

experience.

New focus: Towards a more broadly defined human security

The new and changing global political context, together

with the importance of finding practical ways to build and

reinforce trust and promote economic development, are

prerequisites of a dialogue that creates a sustainable improve-

ment in people’s quality of life. The focus on human security

has renewed attention to the consequence of both natural and

human-driven insecurity, the strong relationship between

violent conflict and poverty, as well as the importance of food

security. Overall human security is threatened by both violent

conflict and natural disasters. We are pleased to be joined by

the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) in this regard,

and to devote more time at the Forum to these issues.

2017: Towards a more comprehensive conceptualisation of

intercultural dialogue

At its best, dialogue is the essential toolkit, helping people

to cope with unprecedented challenges and conflicts and

the pace of change within our modern world. Dialogue can

support and help sustain peaceful relations. But, too often,

the prerequisite of dialogue to remain an open process of

exchange and respect between individuals and groups of

different cultures, points of view and aspirations, built on

a foundation of human rights and fundamental freedoms, is

overlooked and not met.

As we know, effective dialogue between people of differ-

ence and with different needs and agendas is vital for real

and sustained peace. And we appear to engage with it a lot.

On the global stage, world forums are convened to bring

together heads of governments, ministers, heads of various

international organizations, senior policy makers, cultural

professionals, goodwill ambassadors, experts, journalists,

practitioners, prominent intellectuals and activists. These

platforms enable us to take concrete actions to support diver-

sity, strengthen mutual understanding among and between

nations and communities, and raise awareness of the impor-

tance of dialogue.

Intercultural dialogue in the post-2015 era is important

due to the sheer compression of the world, as people and

their cultures have been brought into the same space with

intense speed, creating new levels and forms of human inter-

action and interdependence. Mutual respect – not the same

as mutual approval – will be crucial. Reasoned disagreement

builds stronger, more authentic and lasting relationships.

Avoiding difficult questions, such as political conflict or

differences in values, will be counterproductive, whereas

addressing them directly and with respect will build trust.

At a time when the world’s efforts are focused on sustainable

development for all, the challenges are often multidimen-

sional and interrelated, with the needs of the most vulnerable

being compounded by prejudice and stereotypes that must

be challenged holistically.

A final thought: Intercultural dialogue is important

because it allows long-term and intensive engagement with

people from other cultures. This can help people see their

own culture from a different perspective, which leads to

re-evaluating their own views and ideas. At the same time

dialogue re-introduces some of the detail – the diversity –

into our perception of others.

Image: MCT, Azerbaijan